Researchers who discovered a flaw in the main databases stored in Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform urged all users to change their digital access keys, not just the 3,300 it notified this week.
Reuters reported researchers at a cloud security company called Wiz discovered this month they could have gained access to the primary digital keys for most users of the Cosmos DB database system, allowing them to steal, change or delete millions of records.
Microsoft fixed the configuration mistake that would have made it easy for any Cosmos user to get into other customers’ databases, then notified some users Thursday to change their keys.
Microsoft in a blog post said it warned customers which had set up Cosmos access during the weeklong research period. It found no evidence that any attackers had used the same flaw to get into customer data.
“Our investigation shows no unauthorized access other than the researcher activity. Notifications have been sent to all customers that could be potentially affected due to researcher activity, Microsoft wrote in the blog.
“Though no customer data was accessed, it is recommended you regenerate your primary read-write keys,” Microsoft said.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency used stronger language in a bulletin Friday, making clear it was speaking not just to those notified.
“CISA strongly encourages Azure Cosmos DB customers to roll and regenerate their certificate key,” the agency said.
Experts at Wiz, founded by four veterans of Azure’s in-house security team, agreed.
“In my estimation, it’s really hard for them, if not impossible, to completely rule out that someone used this before,” saidWiz Chief Technology Officer Ami Luttwak. At Microsoft he developed tools for logging cloud security incidents.
Microsoft did not give a direct answer when asked if it had comprehensive logs for the two years when the Jupyter Notebook feature was misconfigured, or had used another way to rule out access abuse.
Wiz said Microsoft had worked closely with it on the research but had declined to say how it could be sure earlier customers were safe.